Overview Of Dr Salvato
Dr. Patricia D. Salvato, M.D. is an Internist in Houston, TX. She specializes in Internal Medicine, has 17 years of experience, and is board certified. She graduated from Hermann Hospital University Texas and she is affiliated with Memorial Hermann Northwest Hospital, HCA Houston Healthcare Medical Center, Memorial Hermann – Texas Medical Center, and Memorial Hermann Southwest Hospital.
Dr. Salvato works at Diversified Medical. She treats conditions like…
What Is Treatment Frequency
Our treatment frequency feature helps you understand how often a provider performs or treats a specific procedure/condition compared to other doctors. Providers rank in one of four frequency categories:
Specific procedures/conditions that donât have enough data are indicated with âMay Performâ. We encourage you to contact the provider with questions about their experience.
Patricia Salvato: Failed To Maintain Adequate Medical Records
Patricia Salvato is a doctor in Houston, Texas who has strange beliefs about Lyme disease. She has been investigated and charged by the Texas Medical Board but still managed to keep her license to practice medicine.
Real Lyme disease is very rare in Texas, but there is a large community of chronic Lyme believers. The large Texas branch of the cult of chronic Lyme is a good example of how it is a pseudoscientific belief system that spreads via word of mouth and the internet.
Don’t Miss: Can You Donate Blood If You Have Lyme Disease
Dr Patricia Denise Salvato Md
Internist – General
Dr. Patricia Denise Salvato, MD is a Internist – General practicing in Houston, TXShe has not yet shared a personalized biography with Doctor.com.
|University of Texas Medical School, Houston||Medical Degree|
|U of Tx Medical School At Houston, Houston Tx||Other Degree|
|Residency – University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Program||Not Specified|
Experience & Accolades
Practice & Hospital Affiliations
Dr. Patricia Denise Salvato, MD has not yet indicated the hospitals that she is affiliated with.
Years In Practice: 38
Accepts New Patients: Yes
There Are3404doctors Who Treat Lyme Disease In Houston Find The Best For You:
- Rated 4.10 out of 5 stars, with 7501 Fannin St Ste 650Houston, TX77054
- Rated 3.60 out of 5 stars, with 9055 Katy Fwy Ste 200Houston, TX77024
- Rated 5.00 out of 5 stars, with 6701 Fannin St Ste 620Houston, TX77030
- Rated 4.90 out of 5 stars, with 7515 South Main Suite 240Houston, TX77030
- Rated 4.80 out of 5 stars, with 5420 West Loop S Ste 4500Bellaire, TX77401
- Rated 4.90 out of 5 stars, with 5420 West Loop S Ste 4500Bellaire, TX77401
- Rated 5.00 out of 5 stars, with 1415 California StHouston, TX77006
- Rated 4.80 out of 5 stars, with 5420 West Loop S # 450Bellaire, TX77401
- Rated 4.60 out of 5 stars, with 1801 North Loop W Ste 45Houston, TX77008
- Rated 5.00 out of 5 stars, with 3730 Kirby Dr Ste 1200Houston, TX77098
- Rated 4.90 out of 5 stars, with 1900 Saint James Pl Ste 600Houston, TX77056
- Rated 5.00 out of 5 stars, with 5420 West Loop S Ste 4500Bellaire, TX77401
- Rated 4.90 out of 5 stars, with 7515 South Main Suite 240Houston, TX77030
- Rated 4.60 out of 5 stars, with 7900 Fannin St Ste 3300Houston, TX77054
- Rated 4.90 out of 5 stars, with 6400 Fannin St Ste 2210BHouston, TX77030
- Rated 4.80 out of 5 stars, with 4747 Bellaire Blvd Suite 240Bellaire, TX77401
- Rated 5.00 out of 5 stars, with 3701 Kirby DrHouston, TX77098
- Rated 5.00 out of 5 stars, with 1213 Hermann Dr Ste 650Houston, TX77004
- Rated 4.80 out of 5 stars, with 1701 Sunset Blvd Ste 5FHouston, TX77005
Also Check: Homes For Sale East Lyme Ct
Experience And Background Checks
- Failure to keep adequate medical records View detailsAction Taken: Education
Check if Dr. Salvato treats your condition or procedure
Dr. Salvato’s conditions and procedures:
- Abdominal Disorders
- Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Limb Swelling Caused by Fluid Overload
- Lipid Disorders
- Loss of Voice or Hoarse Voice
- Osteoarthritis of Ankle and Foot
- Osteoarthritis of Hip
- Osteoarthritis of Hip and Thigh
- Osteoarthritis of Knee
- Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome or Knee Pain
- Pericardial Disease
- Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Salivary Gland Stones and Inflammation
- Seborrheic Dermatitis
- Sprains and Strains
- Stomach Diseases
Search for your insurance provider
Dr. Salvato accepts
Dr. Salvato accepts the following insurance:
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
- Blue Advantage HMO
- CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield
- HealthyBlue 2.0
- First Health PPO
- Golden Rule
- Mail Handlers Benefit Plan
- Meritain Health
A Summary Judgment Standard
Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a party who fails to make a sufficient showing of the existence of an element essential to the party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden at trial. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 Little v. Liquid Air Corp.,37 F.3d 1069, 1075 see also Baton Rouge Oil & Chem. Workers Union v. ExxonMobil Corp.,289 F.3d 373, 375 . Summary judgment should be rendered if the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Celotex,477 U.S. at 32223, 106 S.Ct. 2548 Weaver v. CCA Indus., Inc.,529 F.3d 335, 339 .
For summary judgment, the initial burden falls on the movant to identify areas essential to the non-movant’s claim in which there is an absence of a genuine issue of material fact.Lincoln Gen. Ins. Co. v. Reyna,401 F.3d 347, 349 . The moving party, however, need not negate the elements of the non-movant’s case. See Boudreaux v. Swift Transp. Co.,402 F.3d 536, 540 . The moving party may meet its burden by pointing out the absence of evidence supporting the nonmoving party’s case.Duffy v. Leading Edge Prods., Inc.,44 F.3d 308, 312 ).
Recommended Reading: Stop And Shop East Lyme
B Proof Of Total Disability
Furthermore, the existence of a difficult physical condition is insufficient to warrant an award of total disability benefits to Bistany under her disability insurance policy. Reliance essentially concedes in its briefing that Bistany has fibromyalgia. See Defendant’s Reply, at 89. Nonetheless, the issues remain whether Bistany has a total disability and, if so, whether it is caused by her physical, as opposed to mental, disorders.
The burden is on Bistany to produce evidence of total disability. conflicted administrator is not under a duty to reasonably investigate a claim.Truitt,729 F.3d at 511 ) . Reliance did not abuse its discretion when deciding that Bistany was not totally disabled due to a physical condition, even when the Court views the evidence in the light most favorable to Bistany.
Likewise, the Social Security Administration determined Bistany was capable of performing limited work functions and that Dr. Salvato’s opinion to the contrary went against the weight of the evidence. A.R., at 946.
We Strive To Keep The Reviews Trustworthy Honest & Fair
We monitor all reviews to ensure they comply with our guidelines and dont include personal information, profanity, libel, defamation, harassment, obscenity or fraud.
All reviews are confirmed and audited before publication, and community members have the ability to flag inappropriate content for further review by our team.
Doctors can not pay for good reviews, nor can they pay to have negative reviews removed.
Any reviews that are deemed fraudulent or violate ourguidelineswill be removed immediately.
- Didn’t trust the provider’s decisions
Also Check: How Do You Test A Tick For Lyme Disease
B Erisa Standard Of Review
Standard summary judgment rules control in ERISA cases.Green v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.,754 F.3d 324, 329 ). When, in an ERISA case, the language of the planlike the one at issue heregrants discretion to an administrator to interpret the plan and determine eligibility for benefits, a court will reverse an administrator’s decision only for abuse of discretion.McCorkle v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.,757 F.3d 452, 457 ).
Citing to cases from the First and Tenth Circuits, Defendant contends that, since ERISA cases are merely vehicles for deciding the benefits issue, Plaintiff is not entitled to the usual summary judgment inference of viewing all facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Supporting Brief , at 14 Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment , at 12. The Fifth Circuit, however, reaffirmed in a recently published ERISA case that hen parties file cross-motions for summary judgment, we review each party’s motion independently, viewing the evidence and inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.Green,754 F.3d at 324 ).
Best Lyme Disease And Bannwarth Syndrome Doctors Inhouston Tx
We found 3404doctors who treat Lyme Disease in Houston.
Browse through a selection of 3404 Doctors who treat Lyme Disease around Houston, TX. Doctors who treat Lyme Disease in this region have an average rating of 4 stars. Below are some of the best options around Houston. The providers below have at least 10 or more past patient ratings, so you can be confident that these providers have the experience that you are looking for.
Read Also: When Do Puppies Get Lyme Vaccine
Doctors Tied To Multiple Overdoses
More than a dozen Houston-area physicians have lost three or more patients to accidental prescription overdoses in recent years including doctors accused of running pill mills and some of the states top prescribers of pain pills and anti-anxiety drugs, according to a Houston Chronicle analysis.
Doctors previously targeted for disciplinary action by the state medical board for pill mill activity or prescription-related problems were often the sources of drugs found at multiple death sites, a review of medicines given to more than 200 people who accidentally overdosed in Harris County in 2008 and 2009 shows.
However, some local physicians with high volume practices and no association with pill mills who specialize in pain management or psychiatry also prescribed medicines found at multiple deaths.
Harris County is considered a national hub for prescription overdose deaths and for pill mills.
Many local deaths involve people who fatally ingested cocktails of medicines featuring opioid pain drugs combined with anti-anxiety medicines like alprazolam , records show. Often they took more than prescribed or mixed drugs with alcohol.
The Chronicles findings on the source of prescriptions were based on inventories of medications found in homes of local overdose victims. In home deaths, Harris County medical examiners investigators recorded types, amounts and prescribers for drugs stored in bedside tables, closets or still clutched in the hands of the dead.
Search For Conditions Or Procedures
CONDITION OR PROCEDURE
Many providers have expertise treating multiple conditions or procedures. FindCare uses a variety of data sources to determine which conditions or procedures a provider treats and their level of experience.
- View other providers whotreat ADHD and-or ADD
- View other providers whotreat Abdominal Disorders
- Learn more about Abdominal Pain
- View other providers whotreat Abdominal Pain
- View other providers whotreat Acute Bronchitis
- View other providers whotreat Acute Pharyngitis
- View other providers whotreat Acute Sinusitis
- View other providers whotreat Acute Tonsillitis
- View other providers whotreat Acute Upper Respiratory Infection
- View other providers whotreat Adhesive Capsulitis
- View other providers whotreat All Headaches
- View other providers whotreat Allergic Reaction
- Learn more about Allergic Rhinitis
- View other providers whotreat Allergic Rhinitis
- View other providers whotreat Anemia
- View other providers whotreat Animal Allergies
You May Like: Best Supplements For Lyme Brain
Iv Conclusion And Order
Based on the evidence in the record, given the high amount of deference afforded to Reliance under the applicable standard of review, no reasonable trier of fact could find that Reliance abused its discretion in terminating Bistany’s total disability benefits. Accordingly, Reliance is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Court will issue a separate final judgment.
A Reliance On Insurer’s Own Experts Over Bistany’s Treating Physicians
Bistany argues that Reliance’s decision was arbitrary because Reliance relied on the reports and examination of the doctors and consultants it hired and discredited or ignored the reports and examinations of Bistany’s treating physicians. Plaintiff’s Memorandum, at 4 Plaintiff’s Response, at 4 and passim. The Supreme Court has rejected any rule that the opinions of a treating physician are binding on an ERISA plan administrator. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord,538 U.S. 822, 834, 123 S.Ct. 1965, 155 L.Ed.2d 1034 . Rather, the Supreme Court has held that courts have no warrant to require administrators automatically to accord special weight to the opinions of a claimant’s physician nor may courts impose on plan administrators a discrete burden of explanation when they credit reliable evidence that conflicts with a treating physician’s evaluation.Id. see also Love v. Dell, Inc.,551 F.3d 333, 337 . In cases where experts present conflicting diagnoses of an insured, the administrator has discretionary authority to choose one side over the other. Corry,499 F.3d at 401 see also Karvelis v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., No. Civ.A. H033848, 2005 WL 1801943, at *2122 .
The Social Security Administration’s decision points out that one of Bistany’s treating neurologists, Dr. Norris, did not diagnose her with Lyme disease and that, at the time of its decision, she did not appear to have Lyme disease. A.R., at 941.
Don’t Miss: How To Treat Lyme Naturally
C Effect On Disability Determination Of Bistany’s Mental And Nervous Conditions
Moreover, even if Bistany were deemed to have proven she had a total disability, Reliance’s decision to terminate her disability benefits would not be arbitrary because there is substantial evidence that her mental or nervous disorders contributed to her disability. It is undisputed that Bistany would only be owed further benefits under her policy if her disability were due to a physical as opposed to mental or nervous disorder. Dr. Balasubramanian conducted a cognitive test and found Bistany had several cognitive defects that impacted, among other areas, her memory and attention span. R. 1683. However, he linked his findings to Bistany’s nspecified persistent mental disorders.Id. Dr. Venkatesh reported Bistany was diagnosed with recurrent and severe major depressive disorder, as well as Lyme disease, and concluded that she was unable to perform activities of daily living, but he did not clarify what caused her inability to function. R. 1681. Reliance, on the other hand, highlights documents from many of Bistany’s treating physicians that discuss her longstanding issues with severe anxiety, panic attacks, and depression, and notes that her fatigue and other symptoms occurred before she was diagnosed with Lyme disease or fibromyalgia. Defendant’s Response, at 2021.